with the L2 model, Ethereum (and by extension ETH) basically gets infinite shots at goal
let's say Base flops (I know impossibru) well there is also MegaETH
let's say they both flop there is Arbitrum, and so on
of course in reality it's even better as they are not mutually exclusive and can each find differentiated niches, for example Base could focus on a superapp experience through its wallet and MegaETH could cultivate sendy gen-alpha consumer crypto apps
granted the value accrual back to ETH is not as *tight* as it would be if all the apps on all those chains were on L1 (monolithic scaling vision)
but that's not really the calculus, because if those chains weren't L2s, then they would be pure competitive L1s, and the apps great incubators like Base and MegaETH etc. teams would have *no* flowback to Ethereum/ETH
we're seeing some L2s like Linea get more aggressive/explicit about accruing value to ETH (20% fees go to ETH buyback/burn)
I think it's a genius model, time will tell
9,474
89
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。

