This is a legit point we don't talk much about.
But like, why actually would you put money into safer DeFi when you have arguably less risk putting it in treasuries?
> aave stables yield: 4.65% usdt, 5.09% usdc
> usd30y yield: 4.704%
if you've exited crypto and want to park in stables and don't care about borrowing, is the 0.3% extra yield worth the smart contract & security risk?
might be one of the more compelling arguments against crypto. we talk about how crypto will replace traditional banking systems but is it actually a good place to passively store wealth
u see protocols getting hacked, people getting drained left and right, kidnapped
id pay 0.3% a year not to get $5 wrenched but that's just me
for crypto to really be worthwhile to most then the yields need to be compelling when adjusted for risk. depositor protections play a role here for sure
1,187
6
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。