Pretty based how @redstone_defi as an oracle infra,continues to prove one of the most adaptive + execution-driven. Protocols within easily commodised domains like oracle services require decisive go-to-market strategy that consistently identifies + fills market gaps, and this is a good case study. With the growing traction of @arbitrum Stylus architecture (which enables full interoperability between WASM ⇄ Solidity), RedStone has rapidly expanded its native Rust-based SDK to deliver superior oracle integration across chains. This enables RedStone to also take advantage of: 1️⃣ 34% lower computational overhead (23k vs 35k gas on Ethereum) 2️⃣ 50% reduction in per-call computation cost (16k → 8k gas) This is a crucial unlock. Oracles underpin every dApp, and real scalability often hinges less on the chain’s base-layer limits than on oracle efficiency + integration depth. Stylus itself is purpose-built for high-throughput, low-latency apps which supporting ubiquitous languages like C, C++ & Rust. By allowing direct memory access + eliminating costly stack-based data handling, Stylus essentially aligns data operations with hardware-level word sizes, delivering near-native perf. for DeFi workloads. When combined with RedStone’s lightweight oracle feed, this enables massively parallel data throughput + sub-ms response cycles which effectively pushing oracle performance to 'machine speed'. This is the kind of technical advancement needed to push the limits of modular DeFi infra for near-Web2 responsiveness. RedStone’s ability to ship fast, integrate natively +adapt across execution environments positions it not just as another oracle provider, but as an early-mover infrastructure leader in an increasingly institutionalised DeFi ecosystem imo.
Oracles are uniquely better on Arbitrum. The latest implementation by @redstone_defi is resulting in 34% cheaper computational overhead and 50% cheaper per-feed computation! Building on Arbitrum is a no-brainer. Arbitrum Everywhere.
2.21 K
16
El contenido al que estás accediendo se ofrece por terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es autor de la información y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido solo se proporciona con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo enlazado para más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. Los holdings de activos digitales, incluidos stablecoins y NFT, suponen un alto nivel de riesgo y pueden fluctuar mucho. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti según tu situación financiera.